Commercial Arbitrations
- Representative Experience
X (New York) v. Y (Santiago, Chile):
Acted for X, a software company, in arbitral claims (AAA Rules, seated in Miami) relating to the operation of a software under a SAAS agreement.
X (France) v. Y (Switzerland):
Acted for a French individual in an arbitration (HKIAC rules, seated in Hong Kong) in a dispute relating to the ownership of shares in a Hong Kong entity.
X (India) v. Y (Phillipines):
Acted for and advised an Indian biotech company in an arbitration claim (ICC rules, seated in London) relating to an agreement for the supply of sub-licensed patented medicines to a foreign buyer.
X (India) v. Y (India):
Acted for an Indian aviation company (LCIA rules, seated in New Delhi) in a shareholder dispute between promoters regarding related party transactions.
X (Mauritius) v. Y (India):
Acted for a Mauritian investor against its Indian joint venture partner in a Singapore seated arbitration (SIAC rules) regarding shareholder claims for mismanagement.
X (India) v. Y (Singapore):
Acted for an Indian entity in pre-arbitration court proceedings and the initiation of an arbitration (SIAC Rules, seated in New Delhi) relating to certain claims arising out of a demerger under the Companies Act 1956.
X (Foreign Buyers) v. Y (Indian Coal Supplier):
Acted for an Indian coal supplier in a set of arbitrations (ad hoc and SIAC rules, seated in New Delhi and Singapore, respectively) relating to a commodity and logistics contract for the supply of coal.
X (India) v. Y (Libya):
Assisted a Libyan state-owned entity in a series of construction disputes against an Indian company (ICC rules, seated in Paris) relating to failures and delays in completing certain construction projects following civil strife in Libya.
X (Germany) v. Y (US):
Acted for a German entity in an M&A arbitration (DIS rules, seated in Frankfurt) against a US entity claiming damages for allegedly deficient professional services in an M&A deal involving a contested earnout clause.
X (Switzerland) v. Y (Iraq):
Acted for a Swiss tobacco manufacturer (ICC rules, seated in Geneva) relating to the termination of a distribution agreement in the MENA region.
X (Norway) v. Y (Oman):
Acted for a Norwegian energy services provider (ICC rules, seated in Muscat) pursuing its indemnification claim in relation to the construction of an oil refinery.
Zostel Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. v. Oravel Stays Pvt. Ltd. (OYO):
Acted for OYO in arbitration proceedings (ad-hoc, seated in New Delhi) relating to a term sheet regarding the sale of business and shares.
X (India) v. Y (India):
Acted for the Indian government in an arbitration (SAROD rules, seated in New Delhi) relating to the construction of certain sections of a transnational highway.
X (Germany) v. Y (India):
Assisted an Indian entity (led by Ritin Rai SC) in an arbitration (ad hoc, seated in New Delhi) proceedings against a German engineering company relating to alleged breaches in the erection and commissioning of an LNG port terminal in India and consequent damages.
X (India) v. Y (India):
Acted for the Claimant in an arbitration proceeding (ad hoc, seated in Aurungabad) relating to claims of fraud and misappropriation of land assets from a partnership.
X (India) v. Y (India):
Acted and advised in relation to arbitration proceedings (ad hoc, seated in Mumbai) relating to claims against a stock broking company for fraud and damages in relation to certain high-value trades in derivatives.
X (India) v. Y (India):
Acted for an engineering and construction company in an arbitration (ad hoc, seated in Chandigarh) against a state-owned power utility relating to claims for unpaid dues and damages.