Commercial Arbitrations
- Representative Experience
X (France) v. Y (Switzerland):
Acted for a French individual in an arbitration (HKIAC rules, seated in Hong Kong) in a dispute relating to the ownership of shares in a Hong Kong entity.
X (India) v. Y (Libya):
Assisted a Libyan state-owned entity in a series of construction disputes against an Indian company (ICC rules, seated in Paris) relating to failures and delays in completing certain construction projects following civil strife in Libya.
X (India) v. Y (Singapore):
Acted for an Indian entity in pre-arbitration court proceedings and the initiation of an arbitration (SIAC Rules, seated in New Delhi) relating to certain claims arising out of a demerger under the Companies Act 1956.
X (Germany) v. Y (US):
Acted for a German entity in an M&A arbitration (DIS rules, seated in Frankfurt) against a US entity claiming damages for allegedly deficient professional services in an M&A deal involving a contested earnout clause.
X (Germany) v. Y (India):
Assisted an Indian entity (led by Ritin Rai SC) in an arbitration (ad hoc, seated in New Delhi) proceedings against a German engineering company relating to alleged breaches in the erection and commissioning of an LNG port terminal in India and consequent damages.
X (India) v. Y (India):
Acted for an engineering and construction company in an arbitration (ad hoc, seated in Chandigarh) against a state-owned power utility relating to claims for unpaid dues and damages.
X (India) v. Y (Japan):
Acted for an India-incorporated seller against a Japanese-incorporated buyer in a Singapore seated arbitration (SIAC rules) regarding the sale and purchase of semi-conductors.
X (Lebanon) v. Y (United Kingdom):
Acted for a Lebanese investor (private individual) in a Paris seated arbitration (ICC rules) against their British joint-venture partner in a dispute involving shareholder claims for oppression and mismanagement.
X (Mauritius) v. Y (India):
Acted for a Mauritian investor against its Indian joint venture partner in a Singapore seated arbitration (SIAC rules) regarding shareholder claims for mismanagement.
X (Japan) v. Y (Australia):
Acted for a Japanese EPC Contractor against an Australian Employer in a Melbourne seated arbitration (ICC rules) regarding the construction of an onshore LNG Plant located in the Asia-Pacific region.
X (Japan) v. Y (Netherlands):
Acted for a Japanese civil works Contractor against a Dutch dredging sub-contractor in a Singapore seated arbitration (SIAC rules) regarding the construction of a power plant in Southeast Asia.
X (European Contractors) v. Y (Central American Republic):
Acted for a consortium of European contractors acting as the main Contractor in a Miami seated arbitration (ICC rules) concerning one of the world’s largest infrastructure projects located in Central America.
X (France) v. Y (Central American Republic):
Acted for a French Contractor against a Central American Employer in an arbitration seated in Central America (ICC rules) regarding the construction of a long span cable-stayed bridge.
X (India) v. Y (India):
Acted for the Claimant in an arbitration proceeding (ad hoc, seated in Aurungabad) relating to claims of fraud and misappropriation of land assets from a partnership.
X (India) v. Y (India):
Advised in relation to arbitration proceedings (ad hoc, seated in Mumbai) relating to claims against a stock broking company for fraud and damages in relation to certain high-value trades in derivatives.